- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by .
- Topic
Another member made me aware of Keystone Conference. It’s billed as: “the Eleventh Annual Keystone Conference, “A Celebration of Gender Diversity,” hosted by TransCentralPA in Pennsylvania’s capital city of Harrisburg!” It just happened in late March. I was curious about it, being from far enough away to not be able to go(Minnesota)and have been looking at its keynote speakers. I really would’ve enjoyed hearing from Christine Halquist. She’s in the energy field and that’s a field I have some interest in and will be studying soon alongside Interior Design.
The conference billed her as:
“Christine Hallquist is a transformative business executive, a leader in creating solutions to climate change, a developer of the electric grid of the future, the first transgender CEO in the United States to transition on the job and the first transgender major party gubernatorial candidate in the nation. Knowing she was different from her peers in parochial school and often bullied for being perceived as such, Christine learned to perfect the role of acting as a “man” which served her well for many years.”
There was more, but what my query is about is how she was presented by Transgender people to transgender people. As a “transgender”. Not as a woman, but as a transgender. Is this where we are right now? Is our own movement trying to ignore our genders and only concentrating on what type of genders we are? I’m miffed about this. To me it’s like saying, “Look at Billy’s natural teeth aren’t they nice? vs. Look at Billy’s orthodontic teeth, aren’t they nice?” All in all teeth are teeth, gender is gender, Christine ran for office of Governor of Vermont. I understand the huge weight of her identity especially as the first transgender woman to run for it. Thing is, cis women aren’t declaring their cisgender descriptor when they run for public office. Like Hillary Clinton and so many before and after her cis women claim to be part of the women’s movement. Not cisgender or transgender women’s movement but simply women’s movement. Christine gets billed as being a part of that in the last line of her billing.
My efforts have always been to keep up with the times. To live my life with dignity. Seems like a slurring action, but I suppose we do that to all minority groups, too, in America. I think it was Morgan Freeman who mentioned “I’m not black, I’m an American.” I agree with him within my own context. “I’m an American, enough said.” I’m curious what others think about being billed solely as “a transgender”.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.